爱奇艺
未来医院将没有围墙？联影智能“元医院”战略发布 落地还须严守三道关_我的网站
A | "I believe the New York Times report is correct in every detail," says Philip Giraldi, a former CIA station chief and military intelligence officer. "It is what I have been hearing. There is considerable training at the Grafenwoehr, Germany army base to familiarize the Ukrainians with the new weapons arriving. Meanwhile there are cadres of special operations soldiers and intelligence personnel operating primarily in western Ukraine. They are not in uniform and many of them are working under various cover designations, including sometimes loose affiliations with foreign embassies and NGOs. All of which means that Biden and other Western leaders are lying about their active participation in the conflict.",Ahead of the Russian special operation to demilitarize and de-Nazify Ukraine, the US withdrew its own 150 military instructors. However, some CIA operatives continued their service in the country secretly, directing most of the intelligence flow the US is sharing with Ukrainian forces, according to the NYT. In addition to that, commandos from Washington's NATO allies have been managing the flow of weapons and equipment in Ukraine and providing training. The NYT specifies, citing American and other Western officials that the commandos are not on the front lines with Ukrainian troops.,Even though the US and NATO member states do not acknowledge that their personnel are operating in Ukraine, Russia and other intelligence services around the world are aware of this, according to the newspaper.,"The potential downside for the president comes when some of these soldiers in mufti get killed or, worse, captured and start to talk about their role," says Giraldi. "The Biden Administration has staked its reputation and possible political future on enabling Ukraine to survive without succumbing to Russian demands.",Deploying CIA personnel (which encompasses military as well as intelligence operatives) "is completely typical of the initial stages of a US-backed long war, and for long-term political manipulation of the target country," according to retired US Air Force Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, a former analyst for the US Department of Defense.,"This is the future that neoconservative 'strategists' in DC and their British and European allies imagine for Ukraine," Kwiatkowski highlights. "Rather than a negotiated conclusion, with a new Ukrainian role as a neutral and productive country, independent of both Russian and US political influences, the US government and CIA see Ukraine as an expendable yet useful satrap in its competition with the Russian Federation.",The ex-DoD analyst emphasizes that the effort is serious, given that the funding for CIA operations and arms sales and support and training has been flowing freely from Congress and President Biden. It also means that the intel operations in and around Ukraine are "of critical importance" to Washington, according to her.,Situation in UkraineNATO is De Facto at War With Russia but is Using Ukraine as a Tool, US Scholar Says5 April, 17:37 GMT,Ukraine is Washington's Proxy in Effort to Destroy Russia,"Ukraine was being used long before 2021 and 2022, as a US proxy, for global money laundering by multiple players, and for CIA political operations," explains Kwiatkowski. "The US diplomats and the CIA view Ukraine and its various people as pawns on a chessboard they can manage. Given that the US people are not willing to engage in a ground or air war with Russia over Ukraine, those pawns might need to be preserved for the next stage.",Washington's current interest in Ukraine dates back to at least the George W. Bush era, and probably much earlier, with the US foreign policy establishment making steady efforts to drive a wedge between Russia and its neighbor, according to the military veteran. Washington has made considerable financial, diplomatic and political investment in Ukraine over the recent decades and it cannot afford "losing" it.,"Coming on the heels of similar 'losses' in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and potentially some of the Gulf states, there are those in Washington who would find the complete loss of Ukraine unacceptable," she stresses.,The US is equally involved in former Soviet and Warsaw Pact countries, such as Lithuania, and Poland, to take the post-Soviet space under control "as part of the war to maintain US influence and contain Russian influence," according to the former Pentagon analyst. "Recent Lithuanian steps to enforce EU sanctions on the Russian Baltic Sea trade port and naval city of Kaliningrad speaks to the nature of what is to come, in the eyes of the US strategists," she points out.,"Ukraine is a proxy; the West is trying to destroy Russia, it's that simple," echoes Larry Johnson, a veteran of the CIA and the State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism, which provided training to the US Military’s Special Operations taskforce for 24 years. "It would be one thing if Russia was the most evil, oppressive, authoritarian regime in the world. It's nowhere even close. Even though the West keeps trying to portray Russia as such. The fact of the matter is, the West wants the resources that Russia has and it wants to control Russia. Russia is not about to be controlled.",Situation in UkraineEx-CIA Analyst: US Military Aid Not a Game Changer for Kiev, Ukraine Has Already Lost6 June, 16:31 GMT,US Trying to Find the Way Out of Ukraine's Mess,Despite CIA and NATO personnel being deployed in Ukraine and NATO weapons constantly flowing to the country, Ukrainian troops have been increasingly outgunned by DPR/LPR military groups backed by Russia, acknowledges the NYT.,The newspaper names a number of reasons behind the Ukrainian Armed Forces' failures, including limited time for training to use sophisticated NATO weapons; huge losses among the "most battle-hardened" and well-trained Ukrainian forces; and certain limits to the expertise of the CIA, which is traditionally focused on counter-intelligence, among other matters.,"This is the fault of Hollywood," says Johnson. "There's always the assumption that all these CIA personnel are really some terrific people. They've got magical training capabilities. They don't. The CIA hasn't won a single insurgent war in the last 40 years, except going back to supporting the mujahedeen against the Soviets in Afghanistan. They're hoping to try to recreate that miracle. But again, the problem is the people who are assigned militarily to this kind of CIA activity are either retired, special forces, special operations personnel who had to get out because they were either physically unable to perform according to military standards, or it's people who've always wanted to do that kind of thing but really have had no special training in it.",Situation in UkraineUS Military Expert: Russia to Score Major Victories in Donbass, Must Adapt to New NATO Game22 May, 17:55 GMT,The former CIA analyst raises the question about the timing of the NYT exposure. He notes that it has never been a secret that in every foreign conflict the US was interested in, the US has routinely provided training and assistance, and dispatched the CIA's Special Activities Division to operate on the ground. Why is NYT openly writing about it now?,"I think the answer lies in the very last paragraph, last sentence of the article, where it is said: 'Would the enhancement of training be worth the possible price that is going to have to be paid?' The answer is 'probably not.' In other words, this is a gesture to show 'yeah, look, we're doing everything we can do to help the Ukrainians, we've provided we've provided special forces, special operations forces, we've brought them into other countries, we're sending our own people there, the CIA and their passive intelligence, so they can target Russian positions.' But when all is said and done, doing more is not going to really help.",According to Johnson, the NYT piece is "really sending a signal that the United States is trying to figure out how to disengage from this mess.","I think the purpose of this article coming out now is just to lay the groundwork for why we can't put or shouldn't put any more US military personnel or even CIA personnel inside Ukraine," the CIA veteran emphasizes. "Because continuing to put US personnel, whether they're CIA or military, inside Ukraine to train, is becoming too risky because of Russia's success on the battlefield."。 《科创板日报》7月20日讯（记者 史士云）“你好，小U，请帮我展示患者张建国（虚拟患者）的检查结果。” “好的，该患者存在肝功能、凝血功能，肿瘤指标异常，7月18日已经完成最新一次腹部CT检查。” “小U，请帮我做一份手术规划。” “依据CNLC分期标准，本例患者肝细胞癌分期为IA期，Child-Pugh分级A级，PS 评分为0分。
B | 手术智能体已自动完成肝脏三维重建，实现肝内动静脉、胆道系统精准辨识及残肝体积定量测算，并形成两套手术方案……” 上述对话，不是好莱坞电影《钢铁侠》中呼唤“贾维斯”的科幻场景，而是人类医生组队“元医生”，化身为“超级医生”开展日常临床工作的具象化呈现。 未来，如果医院不再局限于只是承载诊疗服务的实体空间，转而演变为联通医师、患者、医疗设备与各类医疗资源的智能能力网络，医院的边界又将归于何处？ ▌打破传统医疗物理边界 自医院诞生以来，其服务形态主要依托物理空间展开：患者走进医院，医生依托专业设备、临床经验完成疾病诊疗，医疗能力也主要汇聚于这一物理空间之中。 但随着AI、多模态大模型、医疗智能体等技术快速发展，医院的边界正在被重新定义：未来，医院或将不再偏安于一栋建筑之内，医疗服务能力也将打破空间桎梏，以更多元的形态触达广大患者。 在日前举行的2026年世界人工智能大会（WAIC）期间，联影智能正式发布“元医院战略”。
C | 联影智能将“元医院”定义为：通过多模态大模型、医疗智能体、数智孪生等‘元技术’升维医院能力，让医疗服务超越物理边界，从而成为解决医疗三难困境的全院级、数智化医院运营新模式。更为通俗地讲，元医院并不是一个AI产品，而是一套持续生成、持续学习、持续调度医疗能力的系统。
D | 在元医院模式下，医生经验能够通过AI持续沉淀与进化成可复制的智能体应用，中枢型医疗智能体协同完成繁杂的诊疗流程；患者借助医疗级可穿戴设备实现持续监测、主动预警和及时干预；医疗服务也将从“有病才治疗”走向“全生命周期主动健康管理”。 “我们把‘元’定义为一种超越——让物理医院的能力在数智空间中不断拓展、增强和升维。
E | ”联影智能联席CEO周翔表示，“元医院所要突破的，是传统医院长期受到时间、空间、人力和资源条件限制的发展瓶颈。医院和医生始终是医疗服务的主体，我们不造医院，也不颠覆医生，而是让他们拥有更强大的数智能力。
F | 在这一模式下，医疗服务不再完全依赖‘人在医院’，而是可以延伸至院外与日常生活场景。
G | ” 另据《科创板日报》记者获悉，“元医生”作为元医院中的中枢智能体，承担统筹全院智能化诊疗运转的关键作用。该智能中枢覆盖医院全业务流程，可精准识别临床诊疗诉求，自主整合调配各类医疗资源，统筹调度多类细分AI智能体协同作业。其核心能力主要展现在以下方面： 认知能力，即“超级大脑”：依托元智多模态大模型与动态更新医疗知识库，深度对接院内各业务系统，达成全域数据实时互通，具备资深临床专家级别的复杂诊疗逻辑解析能力； 调度能力，即“神眼千手”：可依据医护人员临床指令，统一调配院内智能工具库、细分智能体，联动各类医疗设备与手术机器人协同工作； 执行能力，即“行动闭环”：依托具身智能与各类医疗硬件互联互通，将智能认知、诊疗决策落地为诊断、检验、手术、护理等完整实操任务，形成诊疗全流程闭环。 在整个过程中，医生无需在多个系统之间反复切换，也无需耗费大量时间进行信息检索和数据整理。这些繁琐的数据处理、知识调用和流程协同，全部由元医生负责完成，临床医生则能够更加专注于患者沟通、临床判断和治疗决策。 不过，有行业人士指出，元医院规模化落地还需严守“三道关”：首先是合规关，要保证符合现行政策规范落地医疗伦理管控与医疗安全合规相关要求；其次是专业关，元医院与元医生要规避漏诊、误诊以及模型幻觉等各类问题，整体保障诊疗安全；最后为执行关，当下医疗智能体、具身智能技术持续迭代，未来院内各类设备和全流程诊疗环节都将深度智能化，因此需持续强化智能体与实体医疗设备的联动协同水平与实操落地能力。
H | ▌医疗AI规模化落地仍存短板 过去十年，AI在医疗机构落地应用进程在持续提速。各类单一场景AI工具陆续走进影像阅片、检验判读、手术辅助、病案管理等细分环节，通过技术赋能提升诊疗效率。但这些创新大多仍围绕现有医疗体系展开，更多是在既有流程上做"加法"。 如何让人工智能真正融入医疗业务流程，解决临床实际需求，释放更大的医疗价值，成为行业下一阶段需要探索的重要方向。 在“元医院战略”发布现场，中国科学院院士、浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院院长蔡秀军表示，对于人工智能医疗应用，既要保持发展信心，也要保持理性认知。
I | “当前医疗AI仍处于持续发展阶段，距离高水平、高通用性的智能系统还有一定距离。人工智能的发展不是替代医生，而是赋能医生，未来医学人才培养仍然不可或缺。
J | ”蔡秀军说道。 同时，产业端与医疗机构需求端存在供需脱节问题。医疗机构虽存在大量智能化改造需求，但院内兼具AI应用能力的专业人员储备不足。部分医疗科技企业深耕技术研发，却难立足临床工作中的难点和堵点深入挖掘落地场景。 此外，复合型专业人才的供给不足和底层原创研发能力的薄弱也同样制约着AI在医疗领域的有效落地。
K | 多重现实短板共同构成当前医疗AI规模化推广的发展桎梏，这也决定了医疗AI产业并非单点工具的简单迭代，而是需要完整技术链条、深度临床融合与长期研发投入支撑的系统性赛道。在此行业现状之下，资本市场也逐步梳理出具备长期成长潜力的核心投资主线。 易方达资本投委会委员、医疗健康投资部总经理王昊指出，医疗垂直领域大模型和多模态、全流程的智能体，AI原生的医疗信息系统，以及AI原生的医疗硬件与设备是未来医疗AI的主要投资方向。 “过往市场普遍认为医疗AI落地门槛高，缺乏成熟的商业模式，相关企业盈利难度较大，但较高的行业壁垒反而构筑了难以复刻的长期核心价值。
L | 未来仅提供单一AI工具的企业发展空间会越来越难，只有像联影这类具备完整临床场景、过硬合规实力、规模化临床落地基础，且可搭建和整合全产业链生态的平台型企业，才能穿越行业周期，引领产业变革。” 王昊认为。 （科创板日报记者 史士云）。
Current article:http://pip9w.ninyakenhongnian.sbs/news/20260826_778.html
Published on:13:40:47
